As a result of this part of chapter 4, I have created this matrix for the four main types of critical theory Philippot and Graves address in their book.
Theory | Definition | Strengths | Weaknesses | In the classroom |
Reader-Response Theory | Response to “New Critics”. Asserts that the reader will bring his own experiences to interpret a text (Philippot & Graves, 2009) | Encourages students to share and engage with ideas in the text on a personal level (p. 80) | Discourages a close reading or encourages a superficial reading. Does not foster an understanding in the lives of others (p. 81). | Use as a “springboard” to engage students with text. |
Marxist (Class) Theory | Concerned with the, “political and historical contexts shaping a piece of literature” (Philippot & Graves, 2009). | Has students identify the author and intended audience of a text and what worldview it favors. | May cause concern or outrage with administrators, parents, or students when using term “Marxist” or “Marxism”. | Ask questions to help students consider power dynamics in text and society. Use charts to divide characters by powerful/powerless, rich/poor, etc. |
Feminist (Gender) Theory | “[…] allows us to examine a text in terms of how women and girls are represented, explicitly and implicitly” (Philippot & Graves, 2009). | Helps students examine the way society dictates gender roles, specifically for women. Students question power relationships in texts. | Some students may be resistant to the idea of feminism or feminist theory and struggle to apply it to readings (Appleman, 2009). | Give students magazines intended for men and women and have them consider the magazine’s message and its implications for gender roles in society. |
Deconstructionist Theory | “[…] deconstruction is a process by which readers examine language for its fluid and shifting nature, as opposed to the assumption that language is static and fixed”( Philippot & Graves, 2009). | Encourages students towards a more flexible way of thinking about words, authorial intent and, “the very nature of reality” (p. 88). | Is a challenge to present to students, particularly so they do not think that “anything goes” in deconstruction but to actually examine a text with a critical eye (p. 87). | Begin by asking students to deconstruct metaphors and look for multiple meanings. Once students have mastered this, you may move on to larger texts. |
No comments:
Post a Comment